"The struggle you're in today is developing the strength you need for tomorrow".
Hi friends today I would like to share the essay about secularism in India, as per our Indian constitution India is a secular country we should abide by it. Our Constitution doesn’t acquire its secular character merely from the
words in the Preamble, but from a collective reading of many of its provisions,
particularly the various fundamental rights that it guarantees. Let us discuss this topic in depth in the below essay, prepare well thank you friends.
Essay on secularism in India
Indian secularism is fundamentally different from western secularism. It does not focus only on Church-State separation and the
idea of inter-religious equality is crucial to the Indian conception. There was already a culture of inter-religious
'tolerance' in India.
Tolerance is compatible with religious domination.
Essay on secularism in India
"The fact remains that secularism is inherent in the
indian system, in the indian ethos and culture, india cannot but be
secular"
These words by our former president Mr. Pranab Mukherjee tells that secularism in india is inborn. The 42nd amendment to the constitution of india inserted the word "secular" into the preamble thus making india a "secular" republic. But is india truly a secular country? While the merriam-webster dictionary defines secularism as "The belief that religion should not play a role in Government, Education, or Other public parts of society", the most commonly accepted definition of secularism is "separation of religion and state". By this definition it put a little doubt on indian secularism.
These words by our former president Mr. Pranab Mukherjee tells that secularism in india is inborn. The 42nd amendment to the constitution of india inserted the word "secular" into the preamble thus making india a "secular" republic. But is india truly a secular country? While the merriam-webster dictionary defines secularism as "The belief that religion should not play a role in Government, Education, or Other public parts of society", the most commonly accepted definition of secularism is "separation of religion and state". By this definition it put a little doubt on indian secularism.
Different laws for hindus,
muslims and christians in a truly
secular country, all citizens irrespective of religion would be covered by a single set of laws. In India, however, people of different religion beliefs are covered by different
laws. While Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists are covered by the Hindu code bills (Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Succession Act etc.), Muslims are
covered by Muslim Personal laws and Christians are covered by Christian Personal
laws. So, Hindus, Muslims, Christians and
Parsis inherit property differently, have
different rules for marriage, divorce and adoption among other things.
"I do not
expect India of my dreams to develop one religion, i.e., to be wholly Hindu or
wholly Christian or wholly Musalman, but I want it to be wholly tolerant, with
its religions working side by side with one another.'' So said
Mahatma Gandhi.
Different laws for
minority schools and "majority" schools. Though minority schools (not
all, but many) receive money from the
government in the form of grants/aid, they need not comply with the regulations
of the right to education act? while the
government has clearly not spared even private schools that receive no money
from the government, from rte regulations that force schools to reserve 25 % of
their seats for children from
economically disadvantaged backgrounds (reimbursed
by the govt.), it had not dared to go
any where near minority school schools. Note that Hindu schools receive no such
exemption.
one law for “minority” schools and another for "majority" schools - exemplary secularism!
one law for “minority” schools and another for "majority" schools - exemplary secularism!
Subsidies for haj but not
for amarnath yatra. The concept of the state funding a pilgrimage using
tax-payer money rather strange. A truly
secular country would not subsidize any pilgrimage- period! However, the Indian government spent Rs 836 crores
on Haj subsidies in 2012. The Supreme Court passed an order that directed the
government to phase out this subsidy within 10 years.
If the state were so keen to subsidize pilgrimages,
shouldn't it subsidize the pilgrimages of all religions?
What makes this a whole lot worse is that political parties and large sections of the media are seen as being over-eager to win the favour of the minority communities. Take for example, the unfortunate and condemnable Dadri lynching episode during which Mohd. Akhlaq was lynched by a mob.
What makes this a whole lot worse is that political parties and large sections of the media are seen as being over-eager to win the favour of the minority communities. Take for example, the unfortunate and condemnable Dadri lynching episode during which Mohd. Akhlaq was lynched by a mob.
But we have more positive
side of secularism. we have a history with multi-religious, multi-lingual,
multi-racial, multi-cultural society. Indian religions are known to have
co-existed and evolved together for many centuries before the arrival of islam
in the 12th century, followed by mughal and colonial era. Ashoka about 2200
years ago, Harsha about 1400 years ago
accepted and patronised different religions. the people in ancient South Asia
had freedom of religion, and the state
granted citizenship to each individual
regardless of whether someone’s religion was Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism or any other. Ellora cave temples
built next to each other between 5th and 10th centuries, For
example, shows a co-existence of religions and a Spirit of acceptance of
different faiths after the arrival of islam
during Akbar regin we see Akbar sought to fuse ideas, professed equality between Islam and other
religions of India, forbade forced
conversions to Islam, abolished religion-based discriminatory jiziya taxes, and
welcomed building of Hindu temples.
During the control of East India Company and the British Raj. The colonial administrators did not separate religion from state, but marked the end of unequal hierarchy between Islam and Hinduism, and reintroduced the notion of equality before the law for Hindus, Christians and Muslims. The British Empire sought commerce and trade, with a policy of neutrality to all of India’s diverse religions.
During the control of East India Company and the British Raj. The colonial administrators did not separate religion from state, but marked the end of unequal hierarchy between Islam and Hinduism, and reintroduced the notion of equality before the law for Hindus, Christians and Muslims. The British Empire sought commerce and trade, with a policy of neutrality to all of India’s diverse religions.
The 7th Schedule
of Indian constitution places Religious Institutions, charities and trusts into
so-called concurrent list. The overlap of religion and state, through concurrent list
structure, has given various religions in India, state support to religious schools
and personal laws. Secularism in India, thus, does not mean separation of
religion from state. Instead, secularism in India means a state that is neutral
to all religious groups.
If you do not support equal treatment of all citizens
under law, if you do not support a secular education designed to inculcate
rational thought instead of dogma, if you do not support neutrality of the
State and a bar on state funding for any religion, you are not secular. To be a
truly secular State, India must ensure
equality under law for all its citizens. It must also stop State funding for
all religious purposes and mandate that children are given a proper secular
education. Two basic electoral reforms are imperative if secularism is to be
strengthened. The first is making voting compulsory. The second is making 50
per cent plus one vote necessary to win. A great deal remains to be done if secularism
is to become a way of life in India. "secularism
must be interpreted to believe India first."
Comments
Post a Comment